PREFACE
Today’s world is changing very rapidly as new business is emerging by placing the old ones. In the new millennium, people feel a growing uneasiness about the future. Many countries suffer from chronic high employment, a persistent deficit and deteriorating purchasing power. Like the other business, agribusiness practices are also changing at an incredible pace. In the fisheries and Aquaculture sector, focused on agribased business has long been the marketing channels through which fishermen, traders can be employed and it can remove the poverty from
“FISHERIES BASED AGRIBUSINESS FOR POVERTY REDUCTION AND ECONOMIC GROWTH IN
INTRODUCTION
Today’s word observe the more than1.2 billion people who live in poverty; South Asia alone accounts for about 44% of the world’s poor and nearly 75% of them live in rural areas.
1. DESCRIPTION OF
A. ECONOMIC PROFILE OF FISHERIES
In
B. AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS
Aquatic ecosystems in
2 ROLE OF AGRIBUSINESS IN POVERTY ALLEVIATION
A. POVERTY REDUCTION POTENTIAL
Poverty is the incapacity to earn sufficient income to lead a decent life. Poverty has numerous manifestations, such as malnutrition, ill health, lack of education and skill, lack of sanitation, disempowerment and so forth. However, the most fundamental cause of poverty is the lack of income-earning opportunities. This happens due to a lack of gainful employment opportunities. Hence, at a fundamental level, the only way poverty can be reduced or eliminated is by creating sufficient gainful employment opportunities for the poor. The more remunerative or gainful the employment is, so is the greater the reduction of poverty of the employed people. The reduction of the extent and intensity of poverty would thus depend on the volume and the productivity (quality) of the additional employment. Aquaculture could make a significant contribution to poverty reduction only if it can provide significant additional gainful employment. Available evidence suggests that aquaculture does have this potential (PRPS-2003/2004) Creation of additional employment requires investment in both physical and human capital. Some production activities require much greater investment in human and physical capital than certain other activities. This makes the task of increasing employment through such activities difficult and expensive. A country that lacks sufficient trained human resources and investment resources would find it difficult to increase employment substantially by investing greatly in capital-intensive industries. However, aquaculture requires only modest investment. Neither the physical nor human capital requirement is prohibitive. The principal factor of production required for aquaculture is water bodies or land that could be mobilized by appropriate policies and incentives at modest cost. There is scope for bringing at least an additional 1 million hectares of land under aquaculture in the short term and perhaps 4 million in the long term. If it is assumed that each hectare of the additional land if brought under aquaculture would on an average yield the same output as that of the sample farms engaged in carp polyculture and would employ about the same amount of labor, then it would increase the gross return of aquaculture farmers by about $2 billion and generate additional employment of 247 million person-days, or about 1 million fulltime worker equivalent. Since the gross return is estimated at farm gate prices, the income earned by all downstream activities, such as storage, transport, processing and retailing are not captured in the above figure. The employment figure also does not take into account the employment created in either downstream or upstream activities supporting production at the farm level. If these linkage effects are taken into account, the incremental contribution of aquaculture to GDP and total employment would also be much higher. Very few sectors could make such a large contribution to GDP and employment growth at comparable cost. Another attractive aspect is that most of the additional employment would be created in the rural areas that are the main pockets of poverty. All these considerations make aquaculture particularly suitable as a modest cost instrument of policy of accelerated growth and poverty reduction in
B. AQUA CULTURE AND RURAL EMPLOYMENT
In
C. AQUACULTURE AND HOUSEHOLD ECONOMY/INCOME
In
D. ECONOMIC GROWTH
3 BARRIERS OF DEVELOPMENT OF AGRIBUSINESS
A. POOR EMPOWERMENT IN LEASING POLICY
Being largely a rural activity, one would expect aquaculture to play a big role in combating extreme poverty. Studies conducted since the early 1990s indicated that the farmers who incorporated aquaculture into their farming system were an economically better-off segment of the farm population with larger landholdings, higher literacy rate and greater annual income. They were in a better position in terms of influence, capital and expertise to exploit the opportunities opened up by aquaculture.The hard-core poor benefited mainly by way of wage employment in aquaculture farms. An institutional approach that addresses the complex problem of asset distribution will be needed if the resource-poor are to participate in the expansion of aquaculture as entrepreneurs.
B. EXTENSION SERVICES FOR THE POOR
Poor people are unlikely to have the management capacity, technical expertise or marketing know-how to operate an aquaculture farm profitably as an agribusiness. Hence, substantive extension services will have to be made available to bring them up to speed on the various facets of management of an aquaculture farm as an agribusiness, the technical details of fish production, and the best method of marketing a perishable product with multiple intermediaries and fluctuating prices. Designing an extension program to deliver these essential educational and training services is a complex problem.The government will have to devote adequate resources to identify the training needs and a suitable mechanism to implement the training program. Such a program is also essential to raise the productivity of the fish farms.
C. LOW-QUALITY FISH SEED PRODUCTION
A major problem behind low productivity of fish-farms is the unavailability of high-quality inputs at reasonable cost. The poor quality of brood stock, fry and fingerlings that the fish farmers are obliged to use for fish production directly contributes to the poor quality of the output and low yields. It will not serve any useful purpose if the poor people are given the water bodies to engage in aquaculture, but do not have access to good quality fry and fingerlings. Good quality fish feed also would have to be made available. Without adequate backward linkage services that provide these inputs the fish farms may not emerge as viable agribusiness units. Since it is unadvisable for the government to engage in all these backward linkage business activities, many of which are likely to be fairly small operations, it may encourage the growth of private business enterprises to provide the inputs as an agribusiness activity.
D. IMPROPER STOCK MANAGEMENT
An important aspect of hatchery operation is the management of brood stock. The source of the brood stock, size and weight of stock, maintenance of male-female ratio, type of brood pond including quality and depth of water, feeding of brood stock are the important considerations in maintaining good quality stock. Procurement, selection and maintenance of good quality stock have emerged to be matters of serious concern in brood stock management. Improper maintenance of stock has led to inbreeding of fish species which has resulted in excess supply of inferior quality seed that in turn leads to less than expected yield and production of fish species.
E. INADEQUATE EXPERTISE IN SPAWNING METHOD
A related consideration in seed production is proper spawning through which fish larvae are obtained. Two methods are generally followed in fertilizing the ova: natural mating of male and female in the brood tank and stripping of the brood fish. In both cases, injections are to be pushed at the right time and in the right manner. The source, size and age of the brood stock are critical determinants for obtaining good quality seed. All these technical considerations suggest that proper fish breeding requires adequately trained personnel/technicians. Empirical evidence suggests that the hatchery operators and technicians do not have the requisite type and quality of training on technical aspects of hatchery operation. Results of a field survey from two locations (Mymensingh and Jessore) revealed that 44% of hatchery operators did not have any formal training and 56% had training of an average duration of 22 days.
F. POOR WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
One of the critical determinants of proper spawning and survival of spawn is the water management and delivery system in a hatchery.Proper construction and location of an overhead tank is very important. Pumping of water into the overhead tank from reliable sources is another iimportant consideration.Inflow and outflow of water to and from circular tank, breeding tank, hatching jar and spawn house with the requisite speed of water flow are also the critical determinants of spawning and survival of spawn. It is often observed that the technical specifications are not properly followed in the construction and maintenance of hatcheries. As a result, mortality of spawn, fry and fingerlings becomes high. Lack of technical skill of the hatchery operators and financial constraints are often responsible for substandard operation of fish hatcheries.
G. LACK OF LEASE RIGHT
Roadside ditches and canals, including flood control, drainage and irrigation canals, constitute a significant proportion of water bodies in the country and are owned/controlled by several ministries and government departments. These water bodies hold perennial and/or seasonal water and therefore are suitable for fish culture for varying durations. Many of these water bodies are not properly cultured and as a result the society is deprived of the gains that could accrue from increased fish production. The main problem associated with utilization of these water bodies is the tricky matter of user rights and lack of popularization of technologies suitable for these. Efforts need to be taken to make a comprehensive inventory of these water bodies and to work out a formula for interagency cooperation to ensure unambiguous conferment of use rights to genuine aquaculture farmers. Individuals or groups will have to be motivated to participate in the use of the water bodies with appropriate technological interventions.
CONCLUSION
Aquaculture has emerged as a dynamic subsector of the economy with a growth rate far in excess of other activities. The gradual shift of focus from self-consumption to market has led to the proliferation of aquaculture as an agribusiness activity. The size restriction imposed by a self-consumption activity has thus been lifted, and an opportunity to benefit from scale economies and division of labor has presented itself. The recent rapid growth of the subsector owes much to the transformation of aquaculture as a private agribusiness activity. Aquaculture is basically a rural activity. Most of the poor people of the country are located in the rural areas. The expansion of employment, both self and hired, in aquaculture has brought substantial economic benefits for the rural poor. Gainful employment in aquaculture where productivity of labor is higher than in crop cultivation has increased their income. A large number of backward and forward linkage activities have emerged to service aquaculture. Many of these, especially the backward linkage activities, are also concentrated mostly in rural areas. They have also played a role in raising the economic profile of the rural poor. A dynamic aquaculture that has significantly raised income has also had spinoff multiplier effects on the rest of the economy through increased consumer and producer demand. Aquaculture is still a small subsector accounting for only 5% of GDP. Much of the potential of the subsector remains unfulfilled. The water area under aquaculture can be increased two to three-fold with some initiative from the government and a workable lease policy of government khas waters. The yield rate of aquaculture, which is one of the lowest in the world, could be increased several fold through appropriate actions and policies of both the government agencies and the private stakeholders. Development partners can play a supporting role. With an enabling policy environment, the share of fishery in GDP could easily rise to more than 10%. Employment could also increase two or three-fold. Few other sectors can make as large an impact on the national economy at comparable cost. Given the imperative of increasing employment and reducing poverty significantly, such an opportunity should not be ignored. The government should treat aquaculture at par with other thrust industries, some of which have a lesser impact on poverty, to fully harness the growth potential of the economy. Creating such a policy environment will require close collaboration among the relevant government agencies, as well as between them and the private stakeholders.
REFERENCES
Bangladesh Export Promotion Bureau 2003
www.fishbase.org
Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock of Bangladesh
www.worldbank.org
Economic and financial profitability of aromatic and fine rice production in Bangladesh.Department of Agricultural Economics, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh
DOF (Department of Fisheries).2002. Fishery statistical yearbook of Bangladesh 2000-2001. DOF,
DOF (Department of Fisheries).2004.Fishery statistical yearbook of Bangladesh 2002-2003.DOF,
DOF (Department of Fisheries). 2005. Fishery statistical yearbook of Bangladesh 2003-2004.DOF,
Anik 2003; Rahim 2004; Talukder 2004


No comments:
Post a Comment